<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a significant setback for , Umar Khalid the Supreme court of India has rejected his review petition seeking reconsideration of its earlier decision denying him bail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The court stated that there were \u201cno sufficient grounds\u201d to review its January 2026 judgment, thereby reaffirming its earlier stance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Khalid is an accused in the Delhi Riots 2020 conspiracy case. He was arrested in September 2020 and has remained in custody since then. Charges against him include provisions under the stringent UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The review petition challenged the January 5, 2026 bail denial order. The court ruled that there is no apparent error or new evidence to justify reconsideration. It also refused an open court hearing and decided the matter through an in-chamber review process, which is standard practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The court had observed that there is prima facie evidence suggesting Khalid\u2019s involvement in a larger conspiracy. While some co-accused were granted bail, the court held that Khalid\u2019s case\u2014and that of Sharjeel Imam \u2014was distinct due to the nature of allegations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Key reasons cited include the alleged central role in the conspiracy, strict bail conditions under UAPA, and the presence of prima facie supporting material.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A review petition is accepted only if there is a clear legal error or new evidence. The court found neither condition satisfied in this case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Riots erupted in Delhi in February 2020. Police alleged a pre-planned conspiracy. Khalid was arrested in September 2020 under UAPA and has remained in jail since then.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Police filed a chargesheet and trial proceedings began slowly. Bail applications were filed, but progress was slow due to the complexity of the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A Delhi High court rejected his bail plea, citing prima facie evidence of conspiracy. Khalid then appealed to higher courts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The also denied bail, emphasizing the seriousness of allegations under UAPA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Khalid approached the Supreme Court. The case saw multiple hearings and delays. In 2023, he withdrew one bail plea with plans to refile later. He remained in custody throughout.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Supreme Court denied bail, noting serious conspiracy allegations and sufficient evidence at this stage under UAPA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition, stating there were no grounds to revisit the earlier ruling. The January 2026 decision remains in force.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2020: Arrest after Delhi riots
2022: Bail denied by trial court and High Court
2023\u20132025: Supreme Court hearings and delays
January 2026: Bail denied by Supreme Court
April 2026: Review petition dismissed<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The trial is still ongoing and no final verdict has been delivered. Bail has been consistently denied due to serious conspiracy allegations and the stringent provisions of UAPA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Main Development In a significant setback for , Umar Khalid the Supreme court of India has rejected his review petition seeking reconsideration of its earlier decision denying him bail. The court stated that there were \u201cno sufficient grounds\u201d to review its January 2026 judgment, thereby reaffirming its earlier stance. Case Background Khalid is an accused…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8384,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-national"],"yoast_head":"\n